
My Country – An Unconstitutional Export Tax
After the conversation on the Commerce Clause, Justice Douglas moved to trade. During the Articles of Confederation, states created tariffs and trade barriers between states. Virginia imposed duties on imports from northern states. New York imposed fees on vessels coming into port from foreign countries and other states.
However, due to the indigo, rice, and tobacco crops, the southern states worried about transferring the power to regulate commerce to Congress. When debating the Constitution, the states voted to prohibit Congress from laying an export tax on articles from any state. And worst of all, the federal government would benefit from this export tax. Additionally, vessels bound from one state to another were made immune from duties. And no state could lay duties on imports or exports without the consent of Congress.
Art. 1, Sec. 9 denies Congress certain powers, including the two mentioned above:
No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.
Erik Jansen, law professor at Case Western University, wrote additional analysis of the Export and Port Preference Clauses. As he states, it’s important that these clauses allowed for the adoption of the Constitution, but they may not have much practical components for today. States have gotten around the export tax language as not all governmental charges are taxes for these purposes. Jansen uses the example based on what was held constitutional under United States v. US Shoe Corp., “a congressional charge for use of a port isn’t a tax if the charge approximates the value of services provided. A legitimate user fee may therefore be applied to vessels carrying exports. Penalties affecting exportation also aren’t precluded by the Clause.”
United States v. US Shoe Corp., 523 U.S. 360 (1998)
The Harbor Maintenance Tax, enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, imposed a uniform charge on shipments of commercial cargo through the Nation’s ports. The charge was set at 0.125% of the cargo’s value. Previously, the Supreme Court had ruled in United States v. International Business Machines Corp., 517 U. S. 843 (1996) that the Export Clause allows no room for any federal tax on export goods.
The only wiggle room came from Pace v. Burgess, 92 U. S. 372., which did not rule out a “user fee” under the Export Clause if the fee lacked the attributes of a generally applicable tax or duty. Additionally, the fee’s design must focus as compensation for Government-supplied services, facilities, or benefits. The Court found that the Harbor Maintenance Tax, which is imposed like a property tax, did not a fair approximate the use of services, facilities, or benefits furnished to the exporters. Therefore, it did not qualify as a permissible user fee. In the end, it looked more like the export tax the Founding Fathers barred.
Daily Briefing
- No George W. Norris types last night as Jeff Sessions became out Attorney General. If you care about any minority, prepare to defend them.
- We can only hope that the President’s racist and bigoted words come back to haunt him in court.
- KellyAnne Conway asked you to buy Ivanka Trump’s crap. See why that is illegal! But when you have a corrupt administration and a bunch of tag-alongs, you cannot get any remedies.
- Interesting ideas to change Lake Shore Drive in Chicago.
- No, Democrats should not write off rural parts of the country. But they need to actually attract candidates and work to elect them.
- Just like Republicans used Andrew Johnson to do their bidding, they are using the current President.
- Republicans no longer need African-Americans to win, so they do whatever they can to disenfranchise them.
- A Muslim Olympian was detained at an airport. Thanks for winning that bronze. Now get berated by bureaucrats who don’t like the color of your skin!
- The party in control of the government hates the government. As someone who doesn’t really rely on the government, I hope the people who do and who voted for them enjoy the lead water, lack of social welfare program, and inability to trust you bought a safe product.
- No one cares about the Russia story again. Even though he had no idea what a nuclear arms deal was. I will never understand any American who believed an autocrat’s election makes sense.
Daily Distraction – Legion
The son of Charles Xavier. Legion has a strange history. I have not read much of the character’s story but from what I know, he’s basically a basketcase who can hear everyone’s thoughts and control anything all of the time – which drives him a bit batty. One of the most critically acclaimed runs for the character included art by Bill Sienkiewicz in New Mutants. I attached a page above. The show looks and feels like this page.
Legion
Dan Stevens, from Downtown Abbey, stars as David. David’s journey begins in a mental hospital, but it constantly spirals between the past and the current timelines. No time travel occurs but David tells the story of a woman he fell in love with after entering the mental hospital. He details what got him placed there, how he treated his sister, and how he got out. Much of it seemed confusing, but you must realize that you have an untrustworthy narrator, living in an untrustworthy world.
Aubrey Plaza plays a mysterious woman in the mental hospital who seemed more like Crazy Jane from Grant Morrison’s Doom Patrol comics than anyone from an X-Men comic. I need to know more about her – even though the story makes it seem like she doesn’t exist.
Only the first episode has aired, but I highly recommend you check it out. Don’t go in expecting anything but a trip. But it may end up being a damn pretty trip.
One Sentence Story
I need the mocha based on doctor’s orders because they told me that coffee will help the anesthetic wear off quicker.